| Thursday 20th August 2009 12:23am 1 |

Eddy
14 Posts
|
This thread is for members to store FACTS for future use in
discussions in the Comment Sections of PinkNews. You may have gone
to a lot of trouble to research and unearth FACTS before posting
them to a Comment section. Leave a copy here as well, so that if
the subject comes up again you can easily locate your
FACTS.
|
|
| Thursday 20th August 2009 12:24am 2 |

Eddy
14 Posts
|
All of the following quotes are indisputable PROOF of the
on-going grief and anxiety that is part and parcel of living with
HIV.
"I am a 52 year old woman and have lipo really, really bad. Can
you suggest a lower dose medication that I can ask my doctor to
prescibe. I have begged him to just give me AZT but he is so sure
it isnt enough"
Source:
thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/FacialWasting/Current/Q203355.html
"I had bioalcamid filling in my wrinkles between mouth and nose.
The esthetic outcome is terrible, too much material has been
injected, and unfortunately I can't stand the feeling that a
stranger body, those nodules are in my face. Unfortunately my
mimicry and smile have been also destroyed."
Source:
thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/FacialWasting/Current/Q203160.html
"I have gained a huge amount of weight /fat whilst on Sustiva,
3TC and Ziagen. I changed the Ziagen for AZT recently and found
that the fat gain (everywhere but my face and legs has remained
the same)."
Source:
thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/FacialWasting/Current/Q203118.html
"I had experienced lipoatrophy in my face (had it corrected with
a filler) legs, butt, a bit in the arms, on the sides of abdomen,
(I was on D4t back then and Combivir for a few years. I have then
switched to Isentress and Truvada, but strangely I am starting to
notice losing fat in my hands and feet. My feet and getting more
bonier, ankles and skinnier etc. and my hands more veiny."
Source:
thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/FacialWasting/Current/Q203072.html
"it is common for resistant HIV to be transmitted. In this era in
the United States, about 10% of people acquire a strain of HIV
that carries one or more drug resistance mutations."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Resistance/Current/Q203187.html
"I have been poz since 1982, hereunder the drugs i have been
taking for 12 years Atripla (efavirenz + tenofovir +
emtricitabine) Combivir (zidovudine + lamivudine, AZT + 3TC)
Videx (didanosine, ddI) Crixivan (indinavir, IDV) Invirase
(saquinavir, SQV) Norvir (ritonavir, RTV) Viracept (nelfinavir,
NFV) Last CD4:180 copies Viralload: 9500 Nucleoside and
Nucleotide RT Inhibitors zidovudine (AZT): Possible Resistance
didanosine (ddl): Resistance lamivudine (3TC)/ emtricitabine
(FTC): Resistance stavudine (d4T): Possible Resistance abacavir
(ABC): Resistance tenofovir (TDF): Resistance Non Nucleoside RT
Inhibitors nevirapine (NVP): Resistance efavirenz (EFV):
Resistance etravirine (ETR): Possible Resistance Protease
Inhibitors saquinavir + ritonavir (SQV/r): Resistance indinavir
(IDV): Resistance IDV/r**: Possible Resistance nelfinavir (NFV):
Resistance amprenavir (APV)/ fosamprenavir (FPV): Resistance
APV/r or FPV/r**: Resistance lopinavir + ritonavir (LPV/r): No
Evidence of Resistance atazanavir (ATV): Resistance atazanavir +
ritonavir (ATV/r)**: Possible Resistance tipranavir +ritonavir
(TPV/r): No Evidence of Resistance darunavir + ritonavir (DRV/r):
No Evidence of Resistance"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Resistance/Current/Q203189.html
"My statement of >98% effectiveness is generous by many
standards; other reputable sources put condom effectiveness at
96% or below. The average breakage rate for condoms is 2% (per
CDC), i.e. 2 for every 100 condoms."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Resistance/Current/Q203188.html
"My friend has take Kaletra and other HIV anti-drug. His CD4 is
246. He gets diarrhea two times per day almost everyday even
[though] he tried to eat safe food."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203364.html
"it appears that HIV infection (including untreated HIV
infection) increases the risk for heart disease due to narrowing
of the coronary arteries."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203365.html
"Gaining weight also contributes to diabetes risk and is common
in both the general population and perhaps more so in persons
taking effective HIV drugs. Your current HIV meds have not been
clearly linked to an increased risk for diabetes but data on that
is still limited particularly for etravirine and
raltegravir."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203360.html
"I'm still having some issues with balance, concentration,
headaches, heart palpitations, sleep issues ( I literally feel
like I'm dropping in a rollercoster when I try to sleep) fuzzy
vision, confusion - these symptoms are mild and intermittent but
regular."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203359.html
"How long can a person live at cd4 of only 50, despite total ART
adherence, and undetectable viral load, my cd4 count has remained
a flat 50 for the past 3 yrs"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203278.html
"Atripla was a pretty easy drug on me at first. Then came the
cinematic, vivid and often just completely indescribable dream
scenes where it at times was difficult to discern reality vs.
just being asleep and on my Atripla-trip."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203208.html
"I have started wasting 2006 , I stopped the treatment then , my
doctor put me in truvada in 2007 it did help my butt was getting
smaller byday, I started my personal diet trying to gain wait but
still I could'nt put the weight in right places like my butt and
legs , and 2 months ago I started Nandrolene deca with protein
suplements and herbs, for the 1st time in 3yrs wasting battle my
butt is gaining some muscle and fat I am on better shape now.
"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203210.html
"Hi, I've been on treatment since 97 and d4T did its bit on my
face, bum, legs and arms. My face has been 'fixed' with New Fill.
This has been done in the NHS(I live in the UK). My HIV doctor
has prescribed me Steroids which has marginally helped on my arms
and legs. However, my bum has gone forever!. What can I
do?"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203212.html
"I recently had a 24hr creatinine collection taken. My results
should creatinine at 1.4 and GFR at 63. I am 40 years old 6ft
180lbs. and have been on reyataz, truvada, and norvir for 1 year.
(1st regimen) I am shocked. Am I going to be on dialysis soon?
Can I bring those numbers up or change anything about my normal
routine, eating/drinking pattern? My doctor recommended I take
another urine collection in 3 months and then if the numbers are
still around 60 he wants to change the truvada for something
else. He stated that number is too low for someone my age. I am
worried. What should I do?"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203207.html
"Effective HIV therapy often results in 5-15 pounds of weight
gain on a variety of regimens."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q203166.html
"You will want to discuss starting HIV medications as soon as you
can. If you tolerate your medications for HCV, I would start your
other HIV medications within about 4 to 6 weeks. Avoid
zidovudine, which increases the risk of anemia while on
ribavirin; also do NOT take didanosine (ddI), which can be
hazardous due to a drug interaction with ribavirin."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Hepatitis/Current/Q203180.html
"Having HIV is anything but "normal!" Being diagnosed HIV
positive is always a shock and a period of adjustment is to be
expected. The more you learn about HIV the less frightening it
becomes and the easier it is to live with. I would suggest you
begin by reviewing the information on The Body's homepage: "HIV
Basics." There you will find chapters, such as "Just Diagnosed"
and "HIV Medications.""
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Fatigue/Current/Q203109.html
"I change my medication after 6 months I started it-before I
taked Kaletra and Truvada and after Truvada and Viramun… after
couple months-I start feel pain in my back-kidney arria,and
everyday my face and my eyes quietly swelling -heavy.. I check
witch my doctor urine and kidney-he told me results normal-kidney
seems work ok. but I still no understand what can be reason for
pain and swimmed eyes?? I dont drunk,dont smoke-my food quietly
clean..feels like if someone got really drunk-and next day you
see this person-and say-oh mu god. shut I change Truvada for
something else?and what can be alternative?? I no want
sustiva-its cause migrane depression-and I quite sensitive to
it."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Fatigue/Current/Q203106.html
"I'm outside my home country! and I just realized I miscalculated
the amount of medication I needed while on this trip abroad. I'm
on boosted telzir and truvada. The bottom line is, I will run out
of Telzir 2 days before the end of my trip!!"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Fatigue/Current/Q203193.html
"Some readers have written in and complained of profound ongoing
fatigue in spite of normal blood panels. There are two possible
concerns that are often not mentioned in the replies to these
people. The first is sleep apnea. I was diagnosed with
obstructive sleep apnea after my docs exhausted (sic!) every
other test. Second, many HIV poz people are coinfected with
hepatitis C(HCV) and hep B(HBV) , but many coinfected people do
not realize that they have HCV. All people with HIV should be
checked for both HBV and HCV, two potentially curable infections
that can lead to increasingly profound chronic fatigue and
ultimately, in many cases, to death if untreated."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Fatigue/Current/Q203219.html
"I was diagnosed as HIV+ in 1991 and have been fairly healthy.
Currently, I'm on Viramune and Combivir. My t-cells for the past
several years, have slowly been decreasing, and now are in the
low 200's. My doctor is contemplating changing my medication,
however since my viral load is so low, it may be impossible to
detect the particular strain of the virus, I have."
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Fatigue/Current/Q203217.html
"I was diagnosed with HIV 10yrs ago as of November of this year.
I was pregnant with my daughter at the time. I have just turned
30yrs old in July and recently moved to another state just to get
my head together. I have always been on and off medications
sometimes Dr. recommendations then sometimes not. I have really
never faced the reality of being positive however it has been
very hard to get proper treatment when all it seems the Dr. would
do is throw me on a pill and leave it at that. I have a hard time
feeling as if that is all it takes for someone with HIV to live a
longer, healthier life. I don't have money so I don't know how to
seek more help when I am limited on the type of care is available
to me. It seems that everyone in my experience has always passed
the buck and all I have is just alot of prescriptions under my
bed. I know that I am responsible for my own health but mentally
I have not a clue how to begin taking control. I know I have a
daughter to live for but I am barely living for myself. I don't
leave my house at this point, I smoke, and I am just plain
depressed. I feel like I am tired of trying and picking myself up
again and again. I have no support, no family , its just me and
my daughter. I feel like I isolated myself because I wanted to
just die in peace without all the whispers of those who instead
of supporting me used me as there daily gossip when I trusted
them with something so sensitive to me. I have no one to turn to.
I have a doctor but he acted as if he didn't even know how to
read my Labs. I need help fast or I fear that I will not make it
long. I know there is a good life for me to live I just need an
angel to guide me to it. Please I need someone. I am tired and I
can't live like this anymore. I am admitting today that I am
scared and don't want to live like I am dead any longer. Thank
You in advance for your advice"
Source: thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/Fatigue/Current/Q203251.html
"An editorial in my local paper bemoaned that the writer was
saddened that his friend died of AIDS in 1994 just before the
advent of drugs that would have allowed him to lead a long and
healthy life. The editorial advocated that the readers should
take advantage of free HIV screening so they could begin
treatment early.
I wrote in a letter to the editor that while the new meds allow
people with HIV/AIDS to live longer, that life is by no means
healthy and that avoiding HIV infection was the best course. That
editorial is indicative of what I see as a glossing over of the
serious nature of having HIV and taking anti-HIV meds for long
periods of time that is practiced by the medical
profession.
I am 54, have been HIV positive for 25 years, and have taken
anti-HIV meds for 15 years. During my time with HIV, I have been
hospitalized three times, once with PCP, another time with an
allergic reaction to Bactrim, and once with Viread related
pancreatitis. I have taken AZT, epivir, zerit, DDC, DDI, sustiva,
videx, viread, truvada, norvir, atazanavir, prezista, and
issentress. Many of those meds had very unpleasant side effects –
AZT made me nauseous and caused me to feel as if I was full of
ants and sustiva gave me horrible nightmares and daytime
delusions. All of the meds made me seriously nauseous and led to
chronic acid reflux disorder.
I read over the years that doctors were concerned that the HIV
meds would lead to disorders of the pancreatic mitochondria
causing early onset diabetes and dementia. I watched as my blood
tests reported that I was anemic and had liver dysfunction; due I
was told by my doctor as a result of the HIV meds.
I am angry that my doctors never impressed upon me that an
undetectable viral load does not mean that you do not have
significant levels of HIV in you system, particularly in
non-blood sources such as lymphatic and spinal fluid. The result
of this low level infection is that year on year your brain and
nervous system are exposed to the toxic effects of HIV. This low
level infection in my case led over 25 years to debilitating
cognitive and behavior disorders such that I cannot work. I am
unable to follow conversations, multi-task, drive a car, control
my anger and I am chronically depressed.
HIV has also caused painful neuropathy in my hands, feet and legs
which has caused me to need a wheelchair to get around. I also
have early onset osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. I take pain
relievers for the osteoarthritis which further exacerbates my
nausea.
As I told the writer of the editorial, HIV is not for
sissies."
Source:
thebody.com/cgi-bin/bbs/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=living&Number=246518&page=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1
|
|
| Friday 21st August 2009 07:00am 3 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Good grief, Eddy,
You make me feel like I've got my kidneys where my brain should
be.
My brain? When God was passing out brains, I thought he/she said
'trains', and I said:
"I don't want any!"
|
|
| Wednesday 26th August 2009 05:07pm 4 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
By The Associated Press
08.25.2009 3:39pm
EDT
(Atlanta) Circumcision, which has helped prevent AIDS among
heterosexual men in Africa, doesn’t help protect gay men from the
virus, according to the largest U.S. study to look at the
question.
The research, presented at a conference Tuesday, is expected to
influence the government’s first guidance on circumcision.
Circumcision “is not considered beneficial” in stopping the
spread of HIV through gay sex, said Dr. Peter Kilmarx, of the
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
However, the CDC is still considering recommending it for other
groups, including baby boys and high-risk heterosexual men.
UNAIDS and other international health organizations promote
circumcision, the cutting away of the foreskin, as an important
strategy for reducing the spread of the AIDS virus. There hasn’t
been the same kind of push for circumcision in the United States.
For one thing, nearly 80 percent of American men are already
circumcised - a much higher proportion than most other countries.
Worldwide, the male circumcision rate is estimated at about 30
percent.
Also, while HIV spreads primarily through heterosexual sex in
Africa and some other parts of the world, in the United States it
has mainly infected gay men. Only about 4 percent of U.S. men are
gay, according to preliminary CDC estimates released at the
conference this week. But they account for more than half of the
new HIV infections each year.
Previous research has suggested circumcision doesn’t make a
difference when anal sex is involved. The latest study, by CDC
researchers, looked at nearly 4,900 men who had anal sex with an
HIV-infected partner and found the infection rate, about 3.5
percent, was approximately the same whether the men were
circumcised or not.
Government recommendations on circumcision are still being
written and may not be final until next year, following public
comment. CDC doctors and many experts believe there is a good
argument for recommending that baby boys and heterosexual men at
a higher risk for HIV be circumcised.
The definition of “high risk” is still being discussed, said
Kilmarx, chief of the epidemiology branch in the CDC’s HIV
division.
Circumcision is a sensitive issue laden with cultural and
religious meaning, particularly when babies are involved, Kilmarx
acknowledged.
“It’s seen by many as more than just as medical procedure,” he
said. It’s possible the government won’t make recommendations but
instead will promote an education campaign for parents about the
procedure’s potential benefits and risks, he added.
The prospect of the government promoting circumcision of infants
has already drawn fire from an advocacy group called Intact
America. The organization, based in Tarrytown, N.Y., parked a
motorized billboard this week outside the hotel hosting the HIV
conference, displaying the message: “Tell the CDC that
circumcising babies doesn’t prevent HIV.”
“It’s removing healthy, functioning, sexual and protective tissue
from a person who cannot consent. You’re mutilating a child,”
said Georgeanne Chapin, the group’s executive director.
|
|
| Thursday 27th August 2009 03:25am 5 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
From Oxford Mail:
Burka robbers raid jewellery shop
4:23pm Tuesday 25th August 2009
Armed robbers - including one wearing a burka - raided a
Banbury jewellery shop for the second time in five months
stealing £150,000 of expensive watches.
Three men, one believed to have a handgun and another an axe,
threatened staff at Michael Jones, in High Street, at 2.20pm
today.
The men, all believed to be Asian, escaped in a waiting black
Audi estate car in the direction of Broad Street.
The car was later found abandoned in Western Crescent, in the
High Town Road area of Banbury.
The other men were all wearing dark clothing and had their
faces covered.
------------------------------------------------------
What exactly is under those floating tents???
|
|
| Thursday 27th August 2009 06:49am 6 |

Burty
69 Posts
|
SUMMER CHEESSECAKE.
Serves 6. Suitable for vegetarians.
Preperation time 30 minutes.
Ingredients:
200g Milk Chocolate digestive biscuits.
100g Butter.
400g soft cheese.
250g fresh strawberries.
Method:
1. Line the base of a 20cm round loose-bottom cake tin withwith
greaseproof paper. Crush the biscuits into fine crumbs. Melt the
butter and stir in the biscuits . Press into the base of the tin.
Chill while preparing the filling.
2. Break 175g of the chocolate into squares and put
in a bowl over a pan of simmering water (don't allow the boal to
touch the water). Cool slightly , then add the soft cheese and
the and the lime juice. Beat together.
3. fold in half the strawberries, spread over the base and chill
for two hours. remove from the tinand topwith strawberries and
shavings from the remaining chocolate.
Eat drink and be cool with this CHEESE CAKE....from Burty!
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 06:59am 7 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Today in History - Sept. 26, 2009
1888 - T.S. ELIOT, poet, dramatist and literary critic, born in
St. Louis MO (d: 1965) He received the Nobel Prize in Literature
in 1948. He wrote the poems "The Love Song of J. Alfred
Prufrock", The Waste Land, "The Hollow Men", "Ash Wednesday", and
Four Quartets; the plays Murder in the Cathedral and The Cocktail
Party; and the essay "Tradition and the Individual Talent". Eliot
was born an American, moved to the United Kingdom in 1914 (at the
age of 25), and became a British subject in 1927 at the age of
39. When he was living in Paris before WWI, he met a French
medical student named Jean Verdenal in the Luxembourg Gardens.
Werdenal was waving a branch of lilac at the time. Verdenal died
in the Dardanelles in 1915. Eliot dedicated Prufrock to him,
adding a epigraph from Dante's Purgatory: "Now can you understand
the quantity of love that warms me to you, so that I forget out
vanity, and treat the shadows like the real thing."
This is all we know about his friendship with the young medical
student, and all we are likely to know. Other considerations:
Eliot had a horror of the female body, he feared it, and thought
it "smelled." He had an abhorrence of sex in general, though as a
boy, he masturbated guiltily and wrote a magnificently sensuous
poem about it…an excerpt here:
Then he knew that he had been a fish
With slippery white belly held tight in his own fingers
Writhing in his own clutch, his ancient beauty
Caught fast in the pink rips of his new beauty.
Eliot obsessed with the thought that every man wanted to kill a
woman, and without irony, extended his fantasy to all men. His
first marriage was miserable in that his wife laughed in his face
at the very idea of sleeping with him. These are the general
facts, and various interpretations are offered by various
biographers. Thus far, interpretations have run in two obvious
directions. Of course he was completely asexual. Of course he was
a latent homosexual. Either seems unfair in some way; he was
simply T.S. Eliot. Perhaps the first queer?
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 07:10am 8 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
From the Telegraph:
Pope Benedict XVI 'snubs' Gordon Brown's invitation to visit
Britain
Gordon Brown suffered an apparent public embarrassment after
inviting Pope Benedict XVI to visit Britain only to be rebuffed
hours later.
By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent
Published: 3:47PM GMT 19 Feb 2009
The Prime Minister visited the Vatican on Thursday and
invited the Pope to make the first papal visit to the UK for
nearly 30 years.
After what the Vatican called a "cordial" meeting, Mr Brown
told reporters in the Vatican City that he had made the offer
of a visit and it had been well-received.
"He was very welcoming of the invitation," Mr Brown said.
However, hours later, a Vatican spokesman was reported as
ruling out any visit by the Pontiff to Britain.
"For the moment, no travel by Benedict XVI to the United
Kingdom is scheduled or under consideration," Federico
Lombardi, a spokesman, was quoted as saying.
The last Pope to visit Britain was Benedict's predecessor,
John Paul II, who became the first pontiff ever to visit
Canterbury Cathedral where he met Robert Runcie, the then
Archbishop of Canterbury. He was also welcomed by the Queen
at Buckingham Palace.
Mr Brown and Pope Benedict also discussed the need to help
poor countries during the global economic crisis, the Vatican
said.
The Holy See said in a brief statement that Brown and the
Pope had a "cordial" private conversation about the financial
crisis "and the duty to pursue initiatives benefiting the
less developed countries, and to foster cooperation on
projects of human promotion, respect for the environment and
sustainable development."
The Holy See said that during Mr Brown's talks with the Pope,
and later with other top Vatican officials, "hope was
expressed for a renewed commitment on the part of the
international community in settling ongoing conflicts,
particularly in the Middle East."
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 07:16am 9 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Margaret Thatcher meets Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican
Baroness Thatcher, whose first Papal visit was more than 30
years ago, has been introduced to Pope Benedict XVI at the
Vatican.
By Andrew Pierce
Published: 7:20PM BST 27 May 2009
The meeting took place after the Pope's weekly audience in St
Peter's Square. Lady Thatcher, was dressed in black as she had
been on her first visit in 1977, with a dark handbag and star
shaped brooch.
They talked for several minutes and Lady Thatcher encouraged
the Pope to accept the invitation from Gordon Brown to visit
Britain. The first Pope to visit Britain was John Paul II who
came in 1982 at the time of the Falklands War.
Before she met the Pope Lady Thatcher laid a wreath of white
roses on the tomb in the Vatican of John Paul II with a card
which said: " To a man of faith and courage." Lady Thatcher's
relationship with the former Polish cardinal was politically
close.
After a visit to Rome in November 1980, Pope John Paul II
agreed to put pressure on inmates at the Maze prison who were
on hunger strike. Irish Republicans had been protesting over
the British government's policy towards Northern Ireland.
Lady Thatcher, 83, who was remarkably sprightly despite the
intense heat, had not sought the meeting with Pope Benedict.
But she agreed to it being arranged by her friend Carla Powell,
whose husband, Charles, was her principal foreign policy
adviser in Downing Street. Lady Thatcher had been be staying
with Lord and Lady Powell at their villa on the outskirts of
Rome.
Paul Johnson, an old friend, accompanied her to the Vatican.
In a New Statesman article Mr Johnson, referring to the
Thatcher Vatican trip, said: "Of all the Popes that I have
known since Pius XII (died 1958), Benedict XVI is the most
difficult to see. He is a hands-on-boss, running an enormous
machine, and only sees visitors when there is real business to
be done."
Gordon Brown saw the Pope in February and Tony Blair in June
2007 shortly before he stood down. He converted to Rome six
months later.
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 07:29am 10 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Tony Blair was warned not to marry a Catholic
Tony Blair has disclosed that he was warned by his
great-grandmother not to marry a Catholic.
Published: 7:00AM BST 15 Sep 2009
Speaking to L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican's daily
newspaper, Mr Blair said his new-found faith had become the
driving force in his life.
He said he considers Pope Benedict's belief that God is central
to politics, society, economics and culture to be "brilliant",
the Guardian reports.
Mr Blair has become increasingly popular with the Vatican in
the past months.
Recently, a packed Catholic conference in Italy gave him an
ovation for his speech about the universality of Catholicism.
The pope's newspaper has been equally effusive, calling the
former British prime minister "a gentleman, educated, smiley,
courteous in a way few know how to be".
The paper also hinted at its plans for him, saying he was "a
probable future president of the European Union".
In the interview, Mr Blair spoke about his conversion and how
important his new faith was to him.
He recalled how, when he was a child, "in one of her rare
moments of lucidity, during an illness, my great-grandmother –
who was in many ways fantastic – told me, 'Do whatever you want
but don't marry a Catholic.' Which is exactly what I did."
Mr Blair said conversion was "a path I have followed for 25
years," helped, he added, by a crucial private mass held by
Pope John Paul II in 2003.
"It was an episode which really struck me," he said.
Catholicism's universality was its appeal, he said. "If you are
Catholic you can go anywhere in the world and take part in mass
in any country."
The last people to understand this, he complained, were British
journalists, who are still unprepared for religious, let alone
Catholic, politicians.
"It's a shame but that is how it is. However, I can say that
for normal people, as opposed to those who speak on TV or write
in newspapers, it was never a problem.
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 07:35am 11 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
-
Tony Blair's conversion to Catholicism after he left Downing
Street was driven by his wife, Cherie, he said during a visit
to Italy.
By Nick Squires in Rimini
Published: 5:50PM BST 28 Aug 2009
Converting from the Anglican Church to Catholicism two years
ago was like "coming home", he said.
"Frankly, this all began with my wife. I began to go to Mass
and we went together. We could have gone to the Anglican or
Catholic church - guess who won?
"Ever since I began preparations to become a Catholic, I felt
I was coming home; and this is now where my heart is, where I
know I belong," Mr Blair told the Communion and Liberation
meeting in the Adriatic resort of Rimini.
The former prime minister, who now runs the Tony Blair Faith
Foundation, switched to Catholicism soon after leaving office
two years ago. His wife and children were already Catholic.
Last December, in an interview with the BBC, he said he had
delayed his conversion until after he had resigned because to
have converted while in power would have made him Britain's
first Catholic prime minister and would have caused a
"palaver".
He said he feared that discussing his religious beliefs while
still in Downing Street would have led to him being branded a
"nutter".
Mr Blair received a standing ovation for his speech in
Rimini, during which he said he was "humbled" to address such
an eminent gathering because he was a "very new entrant" to
the Catholic Church.
In a speech which touched on issues ranging from faith and
globalisation to the rise of China, Mr Blair also talked
ruefully about his time as prime minister.
"I began hoping to please all of the people all of the time,
and ended wondering if I was pleasing any of the people any
of the time. But that's another story."
He alluded to how his life had changed since no longer being
prime minister, describing how he had been asked to talk at
the end of a Mass he had attended in Tokyo recently.
"For the first time in a long while I was able to stand up
and tell a crowd of Japanese, 'I'm Tony and I'm from
London'." He told the meeting that coming to Italy was always
a pleasure.
"It is here in this country that I have spent many happy
times; and where 30 years ago, almost to the day, I proposed
to my wife and three decades and four children later, I at
least am still pleased to recall the memory," he said.
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 07:45am 12 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Cherie Blair has denied being the driving force behind
her husband's conversion to Roman Catholicism just days after he
said she had been the reason for his faith swap.
The former Prime Minister switched from Church of England to
Catholicism two years ago when his time as Prime Minister
ended because he felt he could not convert while in office.
Last week speaking at a religious convention he had described
the move as "coming home" and said "this is now where my
heart is".
He told the Communion and Liberation meeting in the Italian
seaside resort of Rimini: "Frankly this all began with my
wife. I began to go to Mass and we went together. We could
have gone to an Anglican or Catholic church – guess who won?"
But in an interview with Italian newspaper La
Repubblica when asked about his comments Mrs Blair said:
"He did it of his own free will – I did not force him but
obviously I was delighted.
"Certainly it was an important part of my life – I have
always been a fervent Catholic."
In her wide ranging interview Mrs Blair also touched on her
time in Downing Street and said she was delighted to no
longer be there – she said: "Believe me I am very happy to
not have been in Downing Street when Carla Bruni came on an
official visit.
"At least they couldn't compare our bottoms – I could never
have competed with a former model."
Speaking of her husband's relationship with his successor
Gordon Brown, Mrs Blair said: "Tony and Gordon entered
Parliament at the same time and from here was born a healthy
rivalry between the two but also a close friendship.
"Gordon with his analytical mentality taught my husband how
to write a press statement, while probably absorbing Tony's
charisma and rhetoric. Both have a fine sense of humour."
Mrs Blair added that he main memories of life in Downing
Street were her two visits to the Vatican where she met first
Pope John Paul II and later Pope Benedict XVI.
She said:"Walking through the corridors of the Vatican
dressed in black and admiring the works of art was a
memorable experience. During our first visit Leo, who was
two, sat on the Pope's chair much to the amusement of Pope
John Paul.
"Then there was the Clinton visit during which Stevie Wonder
sang 'My Cherie Amour' to me." When asked about her worst
experience Mrs Blair said:"My miscarriage. Two years after
Leo was born at 47 I was newly pregnant and I lost the baby.
"We were about to go on holiday and Alistair Campbell called
and asked us for a statement to explain why the holiday had
been cancelled.
"We had to tell the truth because otherwise there would have
been speculation that we were divorcing."
Mrs Blair also revealed how her children had been taunted at
school over the Iraq war and said:"They had some really
difficult moments at school, when after troops were sent to
Iraq everybody called their father a liar."
Mrs Blair also spoke of her husband's possible leadership of
the European Union and said: "The post doesn't properly exist
yet, so I can only answer that when it has been created.
"For the moment I see Tony very little, he spends at least
ten days a month in the Middle East in his position as
mediator."
She also spoke of the moment in 2004 when Gordon Brown tried
to take over from her husband and said: "In effect 2004 was a
little premature for Tony to leave Downing Street – there
were a lot of questions pending, such as Iraq and it was down
to him to resolve them."
When asked if she thought Labour could win next year's
General Election, Mrs Blair told La
Repubblica:"Certainly – I'm an optimist. I will
personally get involved in the electoral campaign."
Speaking of domestic life Mrs Blair said: "Tony is a lawyer
as well but he doesn't really have any desire to hear about
my cases, which are above all complicated.
"Both my children and I gave him our opinions on matters of
State but obviously it was always him who took the political
decisions."
|
|
| Saturday 26th September 2009 08:32am 13 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
|
Just say no to the Vatican
Protests this weekend will call for an end to the
Vatican’s privileges and its undermining of human
rights
|
|
|
The Guardian – Comment is Free - London – 13 February
2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/13/catholicism-humanrights
The Vatican should stop meddling in politics and
misusing its power to oppose human rights. Just as
importantly, it is time the Italian government ceased
kow-towing to the Pope’s theocratic agenda. All of
Europe should be secular, where people are free to
practice their faith but where no religion has
privileged legal status and unique access to political
power and influence.
These are the demands of protesters, backed by British
Humanist Association, who will assemble in London this
Saturday afternoon in support of a simultaneous protest
taking place in Rome against the Vatican’s manipulation
of Italian, European and world-wide politics.
http://www.facciamobreccia.org/london
In celebration of Charles Darwin’s debunking of the
Biblical idea that the world was made by God in six
days, the protesters will meet at the Natural History
Museum. It is hosting the biggest ever Charles Darwin
exhibition to commemorate the 200th anniversary of his
birth and the 150th anniversary of his publication of
On the Origin of Species. His theory of evolution was
long rejected and denounced by successive Pope’s.
Undeterred by Church hostility, Darwin made his view of
religion very clear: “Man in his arrogance thinks
himself a great work, worthy the interposition of a
deity...it is more humble and I believe truer to
consider him created from animals.”
From the Natural History Museum, the marchers will go
to the Italian Embassy to demand that the Italian
government curb its favouritism and appeasement of the
Vatican. The Italian parliament too often allows itself
to be bullied by the Vatican, resulting in it dumping
legislation for same-sex civil unions and sex education
in schools.
The Catholic Church in Italy is a huge corporate
business empire. It owns hotels, restaurants, shops and
private schools but it does not pay tax. On the
contrary, it is subsidised by the Italian taxpayer,
with about 4 billion euros in public money being given
to the Vatican every year.
http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showdoc.php?org_id=843&doc_id=1741
http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showdoc.php?org_id=843&doc_id=1751
Saturday’s protest organisers, Marco Tranchino and
Serena Bassi, describe the Vatican as a “tiny Statelet
inhabited almost entirely by priests, with a
disproportionate and malign influence on Italian and
global politics.”
Officially part of the United Nations, the Vatican’s
observer state status means it intervenes in UN debates
on a variety of issues, including old-time favourites,
such as birth control, abortion and homosexuality. No
other faith has this privileged status, access and
influence at the UN.
The Vatican maintains diplomatic relationships with
nearly every nation in the world. In most EU countries
it benefits from the support of Catholic politicians
and in many cases its policies are advocated by
political parties like the Christian Democrats and
their successors and allies. The Vatican does not
shrink from using threats and intimidation to enforce
its will. To keep Catholic MPs in line with Papal
policy opposing gay equality, for example, the Vatican
has threatened to excommunicate any Catholic legislator
who votes for same-sex civil unions.
Of the 27 countries in the European Union, 14 are bound
to the Vatican by at least one treaty. No other
religion has such state-level power and connections,
either in Europe or the wider world.
The Pope has made sure that the proposed EU
Constitution - and now the Lisbon Treaty (article 16c)
- commits the European Union to “an open, transparent
and regular dialogue with Churches and religious
organisations”. No other non-governmental organisation
is afforded such dialogue – not trade unions, not human
rights groups and not bodies representing the rights
and welfare of women, black or disabled people.
Within Britain, the Catholic Church has lobbied hard to
restrict women’s reproductive rights, in particular
access to contraception, abortion and fertility
treatment. It has led the opposition to medical advance
by means of
embryo and stem cell research.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7779559.stm
With increasing numbers of state-funded faith schools
(1 in 3 of all schools in the UK are either Catholic or
Church of England), the Vatican continues to exercise a
strong and biased influence on hundreds of thousands of
young people.
The Pope encourages us to view women as inferior to men
by barring them from the priesthood and by consistently
stating that the two genders are naturally different
and that women are biologically inclined for a more
mothering and domestic role in life. In many Catholic
countries, women who have had a divorce or abortion,
and women who are living as single parents, tend to
suffer religious-inspired stigma and discrimination. In
some Catholic countries, like Ireland and Poland,
abortion is illegal. In others, like Italy, abortion
rights are under constant threat from the Vatican's
pressure on the government.
To the delight of homophobes everywhere, the Pope
propagandises that being gay is an “objective
disorder,” “grave depravity” and a “tendency towards an
intrinsic moral evil”.
http://www.petertatchell.net/religion/vatican.htm
In 1992, in a document entitled, Some Considerations
Concerning the Catholic Response to Legislative
Proposals on the Non-Discrimination of Homosexual
Persons, the Vatican officially rejected the concept of
lesbian and gay "human rights", asserting that there is
"no right" to homosexuality. It added that the civil
liberties of homosexuals can be "legitimately limited".
While condemning "unjust" discrimination, the Catholic
leadership declared that some forms of anti-gay
discrimination are "not unjust" and may even be
"obligatory".
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Some+considerations+concerning+the+Catholic+response+to+legislative...-a0128671084
In around 80 countries male homosexuality is still
totally illegal, with penalties ranging up to life
imprisonment and even death by execution. Last
December, a proposal to decriminalise homosexuality and
protect gay people against discrimination was opposed
by the Vatican in the UN and by fellow religious bigots
in the Organisation of Islamic States.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5268745.ece
In contrast, if Catholics suffer discrimination I will
be the first to defend them. Equally, when the Pope
supports discrimination against women and gay people I
will be the first to oppose him. That is the difference
between me and the Pope. I reject all discrimination,
including against Catholics. He supports sexist and
homophobic discrimination whenever it suits his
intolerant interpretation of the Christian faith. That
is why the Vatican must be opposed and why I will be
joining Saturday’s march in London.
• No to Vatican. Protest Saturday 14 February 2009.
Assemble at 2pm outside the Natural History Museum,
Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD (near the corner with
Exhibition Road)
|
|
|
|
| Monday 12th October 2009 12:13pm 14 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
|
|
| Monday 19th October 2009 09:57am 15 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Jihad Watch Fitzgerald:
Why is Turkey in NATO?
Quaere: Why is Turkey in NATO?
Is Turkish membership of any value, or is it a danger to the
effectiveness of NATO as that organization must necessarily turn
its attention away from Russia to the threat from Islam
worldwide, and especially to the threat, foreign and domestic,
that Muslims who take Islam seriously pose to the West and to the
West's most important military alliance, NATO?
Of what conceivable good, of what possible benefit, is Turkish
membership in NATO to the other members of NATO? And why should
Turkey be a member, and not instead a country that is of far
greater value militarily and morally to that very West that NATO
was originally established to protect -- that is, Israel?
Some still choose to describe Turkey, quite backdatedly (it's not
the 1950s or the 1960s anymore) as "our NATO ally Turkey." Turkey
is indeed a member of NATO. But the main reason for NATO's
existence in the past was the military threat posed by the Soviet
Union, and Turkey, which was happy to collaborate in efforts to
contain its ancient enemy Russia, was a good ally. The Soviet
Union was for the Turks their hereditary enemy, Russia, under a
slightly different guise, and Turkey could and did offer troops
(for the Korean War), and listening posts and airbases.
But who could imagine Recep Tayyip Erdogan offering bases today,
or any kind of military aid, that would be part of an Infidel
coalition against what would be understood to be representatives
of Islam? Turkey today is in the control of a regime that is
intent on undoing Kemalism and determined to make Turkey firmly
part of the Muslim world -- even if, at the same time, the regime
of Erdogan is outraged by any attempts by Europeans to keep
Turkey out of the E.U.
How good an ally can Turkey be, with Islam in the ascendant and
Kemalism under constant siege, if the main purpose of NATO is now
or soon will be to protect Western Europe and preserve the
Western alliance from those who, within Europe, are either
Muslims or collaborators with Muslims? It makes no sense for the
members of NATO to commit themselves to treating an attack on
Turkey as an attack on themselves, when the Cold War is over, and
a re-islamizing Turkey makes friends with Iran and Syria. Do the
other members of NATO think that the Turkish military would come
to their aid if any Infidel nation-state in NATO were attacked,
from within or without, by Muslim forces? But NATO members are
already under attack by the Muslims in their midst, who now
constitute a grave national security risk, one at least as great
as that posed by domestic sympathizers with the Soviet Union
during the Cold War. And they are under attack by Muslim forces,
too, in Afghanistan.
Turkey is part of the very Camp of Islam that is the most
dangerous threat to the West today, and to what is the Western
military alliance, NATO. It makes no sense to keep this Turkey in
NATO. It is no longer the Turkey that once was a fit member of
NATO under different circumstances, with a different enemy.
It is especially maddening that Turkey, but not Israel, is a
member of NATO. Israel is not merely an unshakable part of the
West, but the Western world is, as all educated people used to
know, not conceivable without the inheritance from Israel as from
Greece and Rome. And now that Israel was re-established, after
nearly 2000 years, in the ancient Jewish homeland, its
disappearance would whet Arab and Muslim appetites, and would a
deal a great blow -- understood by so few -- to the morale and to
the continued existence of the advanced West, which is the
world's best hope for a semi-decent model of existence.
As long as Erdogan and his associates, and those who effectively
support them -- including Fethulen Gulen, spreading Islam through
his "educational" efforts around the globe from the safety of
suburban Virginia -- are intent on removing the constraints on
Islam that Ataturk (intent on saving Turkey from Islam and the
effects of Islam) so carefully and systematically placed on it,
there is no point in thinking of Turkey as more than part, a
non-Arab part, a partly-secularised part, but still a part, of
the Camp of Islam. It should be treated most warily.
|
|
| Saturday 21st November 2009 06:41am 16 |

Jean-Paul
366 Posts
|
Why do we hate? Academics seek answer in new
field
By The Associated Press
11.19.2009 3:03pm EST
(Spokane, Washington)
Why did the Nazis hate the Jews? Why did the Hutus hate the
Tutsis?
Hate is everywhere, but the fundamental question of why one
person can hate another has never been adequately studied,
contends Jim Mohr of Gonzaga University, who is developing a new
academic field of hate studies.
The goal is to explain a condition that has plagued humanity
since one caveman looked askance at another.
“What makes hate tick?” Mohr, director of Gonzaga’s Institute for
Action Against Hate, wondered. “How can we stop it?”
Gonzaga founded the institute a decade ago after some black law
students received threatening letters. It has since started a
Journal of Hate Studies, hosted a conference and offered its
first class on hatred last spring.
The hope is that other universities will follow suit, said Ken
Stern of the American Jewish Committee in New York, who has been
involved in the effort. “We wanted to approach hate more
intelligently,” he said.
Stern, who has spent 20 years battling anti-Semitism, said the
need for hate studies became obvious when people started fighting
groups like the Aryan Nations, which once flourished in this
area. Opponents galvanized against the Aryans, but didn’t really
know how best to fight them, Stern said.
“We were flying by the seat of our pants,” he said. “There was no
testable theory.”
There is not even a good definition of hate, Stern contends.
Philosophers have offered numerous definitions: Rene Descartes
said hate was the urge to withdraw from something that is thought
bad. Aristotle saw hate as the incurable desire to annihilate an
object.
In psychology, Sigmund Freud defined hate as an ego state that
wishes to destroy the source of its unhappiness.
Gonzaga, a Jesuit university best known for its basketball team,
offered a class on the subject taught by five professors from
different disciplines.
Student Kayla De Los Reyes was in that class, and said the
information both horrified her and gave her hope.
“Hate is something that is part of the human emotional makeup,”
she said. “Everyone feels it at one point or another. You have to
learn to control it.”
The goal is to create an academic home where a variety of
disciplines, including history, psychology, religious studies,
anthropology and political science, can be brought together to
focus on hate. It’s the same sort of effort that led to the
creation of disciplines like black studies or women’s studies,
Mohr said.
Such academic efforts are not without controversy. Some skeptics
fear they are little more than attacks on the dominant power
structure.
“This stuff tends to be one dimensional and presumes the guilt of
an archetypal white male,” said Glenn Ricketts, spokesman for the
National Association of Scholars.
Indeed, De Los Reyes said one of the more interesting topics in
the class involved white privilege. The most recent Journal of
Hate Studies contained articles about oppression of gays, Nazi
experiments on Jews, the local battle against Aryan Nations, and
Muslim support for suicide bombings.
Heather Veeder, a graduate assistant for the institute, said the
organization has an important mission.
“Hate thrives in areas not illuminated by education,” she said.
But Stern said it is too easy to blame ignorance for hate. People
can have plenty of knowledge about something and still hate it,
he said. The problem is when one person or group can separate
another person or group from their humanity, thinking of them as
an “other,” Stern said.
“We dehumanize them and justify violence against them,” Stern
said.
There is no simple answer to why people hate, Mohr said. Hate can
be sparked by greed, or fear, or a tribe bonding together in
opposition to another. People looking to belong will hate others
to fit into a group, he said.
With all the political conflict in the United States, it can seem
that hate is on the rise. Some people seem to hate President
Obama. Some hate Muslims. Some hate homosexuals.
But Mohr said he wouldn’t pursue a field of hate studies if he
didn’t think something positive could be achieved.
“We can change,” Mohr said. “There has to be hope
|
|
| Friday 5th March 2010 01:16pm 17 |

kenfact
27 Posts
|
Amnesty International 2010
March
8th is International Women's Day, a day when we reach out in
solidarity and join in celebrating the accomplishments of women
who are at the forefront of this positive change for women's
rights.
This year, Amnesty's 6-year global campaign to Stop Violence
Against Women (SVAW) is drawing to a close. This campaign
highlighted one of the most severe impacts of discrimination
against women - the reality of violence in their lives.
This campaign focused on the violence experienced by women and
girls in all aspects of their lives: in the home, in communities,
in schools, in migration, in armed conflicts, and on violence
that women experience because they are women.
Although
the campaign is coming to an end, our work to end violence
against women continues in our work to promote women’s rights as
human rights throughout all areas of our human rights
campaigning. In particular, Amnesty International will highlight
the gender specific experiences of poverty, and the relationship
between gender, poverty and violence through the Demand Dignity
Campaign.
Thank
you to everyone who participated in the SVAW campaign, and took
action in solidarity with women human rights defenders around the
world to call for justice and an end to discrimination and
violence. Your work has made a difference, and we will continue
to build on that experience as we move forward in our human
rights work.
Thank
you for your ongoing commitment and support of Amnesty
International’s vital human rights work.
|
|